Saturday, June 18, 2011

Paul, Bachmann rock day two at Republican Leadership Conference

The Daily Caller
By James Plummer
Friday June 17th 2011

Day two of the 2011 Republican Leadership Conference marked the arrival of fresh blood in the form of younger (and older) supporters of Texas Rep. Ron Paul, in town to support their candidate by voting in the conference’s presidential straw poll.

Their presence was evident during the speech by former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and presidential candidate Herman Cain, who immediately preceded Paul. Cain opened by needling media bigwigs such as Bill O’Reilly, and Karl Rove by telling them, “I didn’t get the memo that I’m not supposed to run! I’m running!”

Cain was generally well-received. But when he moved on to foreign policy and told the audience that, “When you mess with Israel you are messing with the United States of America!,” Paul’s dovish supporters made their presence known by breaking up the applause with just as many boos.

Cain still elicited unanimous cheers form the crowd by hitting on reliable topics such as slashing taxes across the board. When he turned to energy, Cain asked the audience if America could meet its own energy needs and led a call-and-response chorus with the answer being, “Yes we Cain!”

Next was the congressman from Texas. Even with rows of extra chairs brought in, the Paul crowd filled the room to standing-room only.

Paul took credit for moving the debate on several issues since his 2008 campaign. He first cited the growing backlash against the Transportation Security Administration’s aggressive warrantless searches at the airports. (Paul’s home state of Texas is considering a measure to prosecute TSA agents who grope without a warrant.)

Paul then pointed out the growing Republican opposition to the current wars abroad – and indeed, frontrunner Gov Mitt Romney made waves earlier this week by suggesting it was almost time to withdraw from Afghanistan. (RON PAUL: Why I’m suing the Obama administration over Libya)

Paul cited Ronald Reagan’s withdrawal of troops from Lebanon as an antecedent of his own foreign policy.

“When he found out how irrational politics was in that region, he decided it was necessary to get out,” he said.

When Paul cited greater support for oversight of the Federal Reserve –- Newt Gingrich’s biggest applause line Thursday night -– the ballroom broke out in a raucous chant of, “End the Fed! End the Fed!”

Paul predicted that the Fed’s “quantitative easing” policy would continue to lead to inflation and “stagflation” which “will be much worse next year and will be a big issue in next year’s campaign.”

Paul then went back to foreign policy and mentioned the bipartisan lawsuit filed by ten members of Congress, including himself, seeking to have the courts declare the White House’s bombing of Libya unconstitutional. When he spoke of his bill to take the United States out of the United Nations, the cheers were so loud the rest of his thoughts on the matter were drowned out.

The congressman hit upon some more esoteric issues before winding up his speech, such as legalizing raw milk, marijuana and industrial hemp. Upon his conclusion, loud cheers of “Ron Paul! Ron Paul!” arose from the audience as many of his supporters poured out from the ballroom, uninterested anyone else.

The next speaker, Sen. Jim DeMint, professed five minutes later as the exodus continued that, “I used to think you were crazy Ron, but I’m beginning to feel a bit crazy myself.”

DeMint was followed by another Presidential candidate, Rep. Michelle Bachmann. Bachmann worked the hometown crowd, opening with, “I love New Orleans! You survived Katrina! You survived President Obama’s oil moratorium! There is nothing you can’t survive! You have such a great spirit, you inspire America!”

While the crowd wasn’t quite as loud for Bachmann as for the previous candidates, she earned great applause on a number of lines, such as “I will not rest until we repeal Obamacare!,” “President Bachmann will allow you to buy any light bulb you want!,” and (now in the absence of many of Paul’s antiwar supporters), “I stand with Israel!”

Bachmann brought the convention to a standstill for nearly half an hour after her speech when she went into the crowd to sign autographs and take pictures; leaving the final presidential candidate’s speech from Sen. Rick Santorum as something of an afterthought.

Later, Bachmann dodged a question from The Daily Caller about why she didn’t join Paul in the lawsuit against the White House despite her professed opposition to the bombing of Libya.

When pressed by TheDC on whether or not Obama should be impeached if he continues the Libyan campaign without Congressional approval after the three-month deadline set forward in the War Powers Act, she said only, “We’ll see about that.”

Meanwhile, the audience in the ballroom was dwindling for the address by Santorum, who evinced a concern that “America will slip away.” Santorum then left the hotel almost unnoticed while hundreds of Paul supporters gathered a block away for a meet-and-greet to network and snap a picture with the candidate.

Voting in the straw poll will continue Saturday, and the winner will be announced mid-afternoon.

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151

Friday, June 17, 2011

Paul packs them in at major GOP conference

Friday June 17th 2011

New Orleans (CNN) – Rep. Ron Paul sure knows how to draw a crowd.

Extra chairs were brought into the already packed hotel ballroom where the Republican Leadership Conference is being held to accommodate a swarm of loud and energetic supporters of the longtime congressman from Texas, who is making his third bid for the White House.

And those supporters loudly applauded Paul throughout his address, as he preached against American involvement in overseas wars and alliances by saying, "Americans are sick and tired of no-win wars around the world."

Paul also argued against the government's monetary policy, against the Federal Reserve, and against too much government regulation, saying "the fact that we have too many laws is what the problems are."

And he used his speech to tout civil liberties and family values, declaring that "rights and liberties come from your God, not your government. Besides, government is not very good at teaching morality."

Paul polls in the low double digits or high single digits in most of the recent national surveys in the battle for the GOP presidential nomination, but some pundits handicap his chances of wining the nomination because they criticize him as being out of the mainstream GOP because of his philosophy.

But Paul started and closed his speech by saying that most Republicans are beginning to see things his way, saying that they are "starting to use our language."

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151

Ron Paul's VP Propsect?

The Street
By Alix Steel
Friday June 17th 2011

NEW YORK (TheStreet ) -- If Ron Paul were to win the GOP presidential nomination, there's a chance he wouldn't have to worry about geographical balance on his ticket.

Paul, a Texas congressman and critic of the Federal Reserve, mentioned a former New Jersey judge and current Fox News talk show host -- Andrew Napolitano -- as a potential running mate, in an interview with TheStreet's Alix Steel in Washington this week.
Paul, though, did say he hadn't "thought it through."

Judge Napolitano is not only the author of books titled Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When The Government Breaks Its Own Laws, The Constitution in Exile: How the Federal Government Has Seized Power by Rewriting the Supreme Law of the Land, and Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception In American History, but he also has served as a New Jersey judge from 1987-95 and is currently a senior judicial analyst for Fox News and host of a libertarian-themed show on Fox Business News, Freedom Watch.

He taught constitutional law as an adjunct professor at Seton Hall Law School, and Paul has been a frequent guest on Freedom Watch, along with other free market thinkers like Peter Schiff.

Paul wrote the foreword for Lies the Government Told You, in which he said: "I am pleased to recommend this book to anyone who cares about the direction of this country and wants to understand how we got where we are, and what we need to do to regain our liberties."

Congressman Paul has railed against the Federal Reserve ever since he entered political life in 1976 and has repeatedly called it unconstitutional for the Fed to print money. Paul has called for interpreting the Constitution in a way that would support gold and silver as legal tender.

"What we participate here in Washington with the Fed is counterfeiting the money to subsidize wars and our welfare, and we're considered good politicians," argues Paul.



In the 2008 primary race, a potential Paul/Napolitano ticket was a hot item among libertarians.

Lew Rockewll, chairman of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Alabama, promoted this partnership in the last election. The institute is a research and education center for libertarianism and the Austrian School of Economics. Popular themes are free trade, free market, balanced budgets and a gold standard.
Napolitano could not be reached for comment, but he has said in recent speeches and interviews that "there are so far few Ron Pauls in the government" and that it is "time to tame the federal beast."

Paul's office declined to comment further on the likelihood of this potential Republican ticket.

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151

Why I’m suing the Obama administration over Libya

The Daily Caller
By Ron Paul
Friday June 17th 2011

There is no issue more serious than war. Wars result in the loss of life and property. Wars are also expensive and an enormous economic burden.

Our Founders understood that waging war is not something that should be taken lightly, which is why Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution gives Congress — not the president — the authority to declare war. This was meant to be an important check on presidential power. The last thing the Founders wanted was an out-of-control executive branch engaging in unnecessary and unpopular wars without so much as a Congressional debate.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly the situation we have today in Libya.

That’s why I’ve joined several other members of Congress in a lawsuit against President Obama for engaging in military action in Libya without seeking the approval of Congress.

Of course, in 2007, then-Senator Obama spoke passionately about the need to go after the Bush administration for violating the War Powers Act — the very same thing he’s doing now. In fact, while speaking at DePaul University in October of 2007, then-Senator Barack Obama said the following:

“After Vietnam, Congress swore it would never again be duped into war, and even wrote a new law — the War Powers Act — to ensure it would not repeat its mistakes. But no law can force a Congress to stand up to the president. No law can make senators read the intelligence that showed the president was overstating the case for war. No law can give Congress a backbone if it refuses to stand up as the co-equal branch the Constitution made it.”

We are now taking Barack Obama’s past advice and standing up to the executive branch.

Of course, the War Powers Act is hardly an improvement on the U.S. Constitution because it does allow the president to war without the approval of Congress. But President Obama refuses to follow this law.

If a president does go to war unilaterally, the War Powers Act requires him to seek Congressional approval within 60 days. The president can get an extension of up to 90 days if he asks for more time — but President Obama did not do this.

His time is up.

The Obama administration recently issued a 38-page paper stating that Obama is not in violation of the War Powers Act because “U.S. operations do not involve sustained fighting or active exchanges of fire with hostile forces, nor do they involve U.S. ground troops.” Under this argument, President Obama could preemptively launch nuclear weapons against any country in the world without Congressional approval. Obviously, this is not what the Founders intended!

But even aside from violating the Constitution, it makes no economic sense for us to be engaged in yet another war overseas — especially during such tough economic times. For years now, we’ve been sending foreign aid to the very same Libyan government we’re now spending $10 million a day to fight. And it has been recently discovered that the Federal Reserve’s bank bailouts even benefited the Libyan National Bank. Now, we’re taxing the American people to bomb the very nation that we taxed them to prop up.

This makes no sense at all.

The Founding Fathers did not intend for the president to have the power to take our nation to war unilaterally without the approval of Congress.

It’s time for the president to obey the Constitution and put the American people’s national interest first.

Rep. Ron Paul represents Texas’s 14th Congressional District and is a Republican candidate for president.

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

U.S. says goodbye to cable news

Run Ron Paul.com
By maddy4ronpaul
Wednesday June 15th 2011

The CNN Debacle Monday night garnered anger from all sides.  Republican establishment members were angry because their sweethearts, Herman Cain and Mitt Romney, didn’t receive their total focus as they had in the Fox News Debate.  Libertarians were angry because made-up polls showed Dr. Paul with zero (yes, zero) percent.  Not to mention the complete absence of Gary Johnson from the debate while including non-contenders, Newt Gingrich and Michelle Bachman.

The biggest complaint came from the moderating done by John King.  The goal of Mr. King was to get as many questions in as possible regardless of how impossible it was to answer in the time allotted.   He proved to be yet another cable news host who loves to hear the sound of his own voice.  The questions ranged from iPhone or Blackberry to more serious issues like thin-crust or deep-dish.

The blatant agenda of the cable news networks to blackout Dr. Paul from the public’s eye has, so far, been ineffective.  Perhaps this is best explained by the slow, painful death of the mainstream media, including cable and network news.

Among cable news, the highest rated show is Bill O’Reilly’s opinion-based drama, The O’Reilly Factor on Fox News.  It has an average viewership of around 2.5 million people.  That’s out of the 99 million households that it is available in.  CNN has an even lower viewership.  Anderson Cooper’s nightly comedy, Anderson Cooper 360, doesn’t even break  the million viewer mark.  The biggest problem with that is, his show is available in 100.88 million households.

MSNBC is the biggest loser of the major players.  With ratings that are similar to cable access channels and infomercials.  The Ed Show garners an audience of half-a-million people.  Less than half of them are between the ages of 25-54.  That number is out of a possible 95.4 million households!

To give you a reference of how bad this is, WWE Wrestling has a Monday night audience of over 5 million people.  Spongebob beats O’Reilly in the ratings 2 to 1.

This should concern the sponsors.  People are flocking away from television news in favor of websites offering honest, no nonsense journalism.  The new media, which is finding its foothold on the internet, is now in danger of being regulated by the federal government in an effort to block the ability of free-thinkers and the non-zombie public to stay informed.  But the networking of honest journalism has already grown to levels beyond what regulators could halt.

People who still rely on Sean Hannity or Chris Matthews to tell them what to think tend to form their opinions from talking points from the host.  The number of people who follow their jargon, though, is getting smaller, older, and less engaged.  The power today is found outside the box.

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151


10 Congressmen And A Law Professor Just Sued To Stop The War In Libya

Business Insider
By Robert Johnson
Wednesday June 15th 2011

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley and a handful of students filed a legal challenge today on behalf of 10 members of Congress protesting America's involvement in Libya.

According to a press release today, Turley filed the litigation  on behalf of:

  • John Conyers, Jr (D., Mich)
  • Dan Burton (R., Ind.)
  • Mike Capuano (D., Mass.)
  • Howard Coble, (R., N.C.)
  • John Conyers, (D. Mich.)
  • John J. Duncan (R., Tenn.)
  • Tim Johnson (R., Ill.)
  • Walter Jones (R., N.C.)
  • Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio)
  • Ron Paul (R. Tex.)

The bi-partisan group are basing their argument on the War Powers Act of 1973 which states the president may not send troops into combat for more than 90 days total, without the express consent of Congress.

Hurley has handled many high-profile cases including the representation of five former Attorneys General.

The full press release is below:

-------------------

WASHINGTON, DC-- Today at the U.S. Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, Professor Jonathan Turley and a George Washington student litigation team will file a historic challenge to the Libyan War on behalf of ten members of Congress.  These members include Democrats and Republicans from across the political spectrum.  They share a belief that Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution expressly requires the authorization of Congress before a president can commit the nation to war.  This challenge goes beyond Libya and challenges the claim by the Administration that the President has the inherent authority to order combat operations without the approval or declaration of Congress.

The Plaintiffs in this action include the second-longest standing member of Congress, John Conyers, Jr. (D., Mich), as well as leaders from both parties.  The members are Representatives Roscoe Bartlett (R., Md); Dan Burton (R., Ind.); Mike Capuano (D., Mass.); Howard Coble (R., N.C.); John Conyers (D., Mich.); John J. Duncan (R., Tenn.); Tim Johnson (R., Ill.); Walter Jones (R., N.C.); Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio); and Ron Paul (R., Tx).

“We are deeply honored to represent these courageous members of Congress in their defense of important constitutional limitations on executive power,” said Professor Turley.  While there are many uncertain questions under the Constitution, this is not one of them. The Framers spoke repeatedly and forcibly of their desire to bar presidents from committing the nation to war without congressional authorization and inserted an express limitation into Article I.  The last few years have vividly demonstrated the dangers that the Framers sought to avoid in dividing the war powers between the Executive and Legislative branches.  Despite their sharp ideological differences, these members are bond by deep faith in the Constitution and a sense of responsibility in defending its provisions.  We shall their concerns and are eager to advance their claims in the Judicial Branch in this lawsuit.”

This is an action for injunctive and declaratory relief.  In addition to challenging the circumvention of express constitutional language, it will also challenge arguments that no one (including members of Congress) has “standing” to submit this question to judicial review.  These members will ask the federal district court for review of the constitutional question and for recognition that the Constitution must allow for judicial review of claims of undeclared wars under Article I.

Professor Turley has handled a variety of high-profile cases, including, but not limited to, his representation of five former Attorneys General during the Clinton Impeachment, his successful challenge of the Elizabeth Morgan Act (the first law struck down as a bill of attainder in decades), and his recent representation of Judge Thomas Porteous in his impeachment trial before the United States Senate this year.  He is a frequent witness before Congress.  His biography can be found at http://jonathanturley.org/about/. 

Professor Turley is being assisted in this case by a team including Jodie Cheng, David Fox, Kyle Noonan, Eric Sidler, and Geoff Turley (no relation to Professor Turley).

Professor Turley can be reached through his assistant Ashley Klearman at 202-994-0537 or on his direct line at 202-994-7001 or by email at jturley@law.gwu.edu.  For more information, please contact Claire Duggan at (202) 431-9135; cduggan@law.gwu.edu

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151

Ron Paul on the Economy

The Capital Column
By The State Column Staff
Wednesday June 15th 2011

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.), a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, released a column on Tuesday that revealed the congressman’s current thoughts on the economy. Paul, who has argued against raising the debt ceiling in recent months, has also made a career out of trying to decrease federal spending and taxes. Paul has also been a major proponent of freedom and liberty. In fact, online support for Paul is so entrenched that his official campaign site doesn’t even appear until the second page of Google’s search results for the term “Ron Paul.”

On Tuesday, Paul wrote that the “U.S. economy is in terrible shape, and that no amount of government spending or Federal Reserve quantitative easing can reduce unemployment, increase real productivity, or address our debt fiasco.” Paul argued that private capital will stimulate the economy and, in turn, create jobs for unemployed Americans. However, Paul is quick to point out that the Obama Administration has failed to encourage private capital. “We cannot create jobs if we demonize profits, punish risk-taking capitalists, and stay hostile to foreign investment,” professed Paul.

In order to increase private capitol, Paul outlined four steps that must be completed. First, Paul argued that the U.S. currency must be “backed by gold or some other commodity respected by the market.” Paul added that “until we prohibit the Treasury and Federal Reserve from essentially creating money and credit from thin air, we cannot restore the U.S. economy.” Paul recently proposed that the Gold in Fort Knox be verified for its authenticity.

Second, Paul pointed out that government regulations are preventing businesses from taking on new employees. “It is time to start shrinking the federal register,” wrote Paul. Paul identified Obamacare as a government regulation that is too costly for U.S. businesses.

Paul, who has been especially critical of the U.S. intervention in Libya, argued that overseas wars are draining the U.S. economy. “We must stop spending trillions of dollars overseas on foreign wars,” wrote Paul. In fact, Paul professed that “our economy would be infinitely better off if those trillions of dollars had never been removed from the private economy or added to our debt.”

Finally, Paul argued that economy would be better off if the U.S. changed its tax system. “We must completely revamp the U.S. tax system and move to a territorial model that does not tax foreign source income,” wrote Paul. The congressman goes as far as to suggest that “we need to abolish the income tax altogether.”

At the end of his column, Paul argued that “less government, respect for private property, and a relatively stable legal environment allowed America to become the wealthiest nation on earth.” If America disregards this lesson, Paul argued that “the predictable result is widespread poverty and misery.”

http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com/
http://www.youtube.com/RonPaulCC2012

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ron-Paul-Constitutionally-Correct-For-President-2012/201550256535151